A Note on Our Endorsement in Nebraska

Six NE candidatesRecently CatholicVote.org announced its endorsement of businessman Pete Ricketts in the race for governor of Nebraska. Since our announcement, we have received emails and calls affirming our endorsement as well as others questioning our choice. Some have pointed out that there are several candidates vying for the Republican nomination who boast strong records on life, marriage, and religious liberty including State Auditor Mike Foley and Attorney General Jon Bruning.

Pete Ricketts has been long-time defender of the unborn and supports marriage as a union of one man and one woman. Ricketts also supports education reform, market-based reforms to health care, and is 100% committed to protecting the rights of conscience and the religious liberty of business owners and religious organizations alike. He also has executive experience having served as COO of Ameritrade, and has proposed an economic plan we believe will serve well the citizens of his state.

Admittedly, other candidates in the race share many of these same policy goals. This is not a race between one pro-life candidate and radical pro-abortion competitors. That we endorsed Ricketts does not mean we are condemning Bruning or Foley. For example, in the 2012 Republican presidential primaries CatholicVote.org endorsed Rick Santorum. That did not mean we deemed other pro-life and pro-family candidates like Rick Perry unworthy of support from Catholic voters, or even Mitt Romney, who we later endorsed in the general election and worked aggressively to elect.

Another example also comes to mind. In 2012, CatholicVote.org got involved in the Texas Senate primary battle, which pitted that state’s lieutenant governor against the solicitor general. Both men were pro-life and pro-family. When we endorsed then solicitor general Ted Cruz, we received some criticism from supporters of Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst. Why were we picking sides?

At that time we were convinced that Ted Cruz would be a more consequential leader and a stronger voice, if he were elected to the position. While we don’t agree with every decision Ted Cruz has made since, there’s no doubt that he’s made a substantial mark on the U.S. Senate.

That doesn’t mean that CatholicVote.org is infallible in our endorsements. These judgments, like many political judgments are prudential in nature. We research extensively each of the candidates and the issues, talk to leaders in the respective state, and then do our best to determine who has the courage, commitment to the foundational issues, and leadership skills needed to advance the cause of life, family, and freedom.

Catholic voters in Nebraska can choose to agree with our judgment or not. There are several good choices for Governor of Nebraska. We remain convinced that Pete Ricketts rises to the top.

4,328 views

Categories:Election 2014

11 thoughts on “A Note on Our Endorsement in Nebraska

  1. morganB says:

    Ted Cruz “he’s made a substantial mark on the U.S. Senate”. Tell me one piece of legislation Cruz has sponsored. Maybe it is due to the fact that he has been in the senate for less than one year, and he became a filibuster expert during that time. Your reasons for selecting certain right wing candidates smacks of a dogmatic litmus test. From what I see, Santorum comes closest to meeting that litmus test. He has taken the Pro-life Presidential Leadership Pledge which hopes to end abortion in the US. However, Santorum shows a surprising and conflicting liberal leaning position that would allow abortion for the three exceptions of rape, incest and to save the mother’s life. I ask if abortion is outlawed, Roe v Wade overthrown, where does a woman who fits one of the thee exceptions go to have the abortion. We can assume that the minute the new law goes into effect, abortion clinics will close. And, I full well know that regardless of exceptions a woman will not be welcome at a Catholic Hospital. Needs more study.

  2. Brandy says:

    Yep. Not impressed with you at all Catholic Vote.

  3. Nathan says:

    I have to side with those upset by the endorsement. I’ve witnessed this when a pro-life group in my state endorsed one pro-life candidate over another in a couple campaigns. It sows confusion among people who take this issue very seriously–it’s tantamount as saying, “One is dependable in protecting the unborn, the other isn’t” regardless of voter ratings and the like. The pro-life movement needs to be unified, not splitting into camps and causing bitterness.

  4. MaryK says:

    Ask Foley and Ricketts their stance on the death penalty – and you will see where their stances differ.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

STAY CONNECTED


DON'T MISS A THING

Receive our updates via email.