Media Bias and the 60 Minutes Obama-Clinton Interview

Conservatives’ complaints about liberal bias in the mainstream media are like complaints about the weather in February.  They are tiresome, because we have heard them so many times.  But they are also true.  And it can be worthwhile pointing out the truth even at the expense of being tiresome, in the hope that it might lead to some improvement.  We can’t reform the weather, but there is some slight hope that the media will learn to be less biased if someone points out the most egregious examples of it.

This brings us to the recent 60 Minutes interview with President Obama and outgoing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.  The interview was conducted by veteran journalist Steve Kroft.  One is tempted to call Kroft’s questions “softball,” except that it seems there needs to be some more accurate term.  What is softer than softball?

The Atlantic‘s Conor Friedersdorf has done a great job of analyzing this interview as an example of fawning journalism.  I can’t improve on his article, so I will just point it out to Catholic Vote readers.  I will observe, however, that the Friedersdorf critique is especially noteworthy on two counts.  First, it is not a typical conservative complaint about liberal media bias.  Friedersdorf is not a conservative, and the Atlantic is not a conservative journal.  Second, Friedersdorf really has the goods on 60 Minutes.  He compares Kroft’s hand-holding of Obama and Clinton to the brutally combative questions for President Bush in a 60 Minutes interview several years ago.

Kroft should be embarrassed by this interview.  If he is incapable of such embarrassment, he should be writing for Tiger Beat.  It would be more honorable to actually engage in celebrity journalism for teenage girls that to turn political journalism into a version of Tiger Beat for liberal hero-worshippers.

1,101 views

Categories:Uncategorized

3 thoughts on “Media Bias and the 60 Minutes Obama-Clinton Interview

  1. Paulspr says:

    How do you explain the fact that viewers are fleeing the uber conservative FOX “News”? If people wanted to see right wing propaganda, they’d be tuning in more.

    Instead Rachel Maddow is enjoying a viewership surge. It seems people actually do like liberal media.

    1. Joe M says:

      Do you live in a bubble?

      Fox News has been the number one watched cable news station for 11 years in a row. And it’s not close.

      http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2013/02/05/cable-news-ratings-for-monday-february-4-2013/168004/

  2. abadilla says:

    What else can be expected from 60 Minutes? They are invested in a leftist agenda that will not allowed them to entertain issues objectively. They mistreated President Bush because he is a Republican and seen as a conservative. They will never do that to any liberal no matter how absurd his or her ideas are.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

STAY CONNECTED


DON'T MISS A THING

Receive our updates via email.