Mitt Romney vs. Obama Administration’s War on Religious Liberty

Mitt Romney has long appreciated the growing threats against religous liberty in our midst. He faced them as governor of Massachusetts, as the conscience rights of Catholic Charities’ adoption work was challenged. He talked about them in a major speech in his last campaign for the GOP nomination. Today in an oped, he takes on these threats directly. This, it seems to me, is the money graph:

It is a prerequisite to the preservation of our liberty that our government not dictate to religious institutions the principles by which they are to carry out their charitable and divine mission. Religious liberty and freedom of conscience flow from the common conviction that it is freedom not coercion that exalts the individual, just as it raises up the nation.

Many conservatives, it is no secret, worry that there will not be enough contrast between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, if Romney is the Republican nominee. This oped points to dramatic and crucial contrast.

Romney writes:

But, now, more than two centuries after the drafting of the Bill of Rights, religious liberty is facing the most serious assault in generations. And the assault is coming from liberalism itself. In the process of implementing Obamacare, the Obama administration is pressing forward with a rule that tramples on religious freedom, taking particular aim at Roman Catholics. The Obama administration is forcing religious institutions to choose between violating their conscience  or dropping health care coverage for their employees, effectively destroying their ability to carry on their work.

Those of us who object have an irrefutable case. American courts have long held as a foundational principle the right of religious institutions to control their own affairs. It was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court as recently as January 11  in a case involving ministerial hiring. It is notable that in that case, Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church v. EEOC, the Obama administration was also challenging the basic time-honored principle of ecclesiastical autonomy. But a unanimous Court rejected the Obama administration’s position, declaring it to be “extreme” and explaining that the suit was “hard to square with the text of the First Amendment itself, which gives special solicitude to the rights of religious organizations.”

Seemingly in line with this “special solicitude,” the Obama administration has put forward a “religious employer” exemption regarding contraception and sterilization insurance coverage. Unfortunately, the Obama administration lawyers narrowed its actual force almost to the vanishing point. It only applies to religious organizations engaged primarily in serving people of the same religion. But that is not what many religious institutions do; serving the broad public is the essence of their divine mission. Accordingly, they will be compelled to provide health coverage to which they object as a matter of conscience.

In an effort to mollify the Bishops, Health and Human Services has now given religious institutions an additional twelve months to comply. That twelve-month extension is a clumsy attempt to push this matter past this year’s presidential election. As long as the rule hovers in front of us, we must keep up the battle. In a polity that provides all manners of exemption on the basis of religious freedom, it is an appalling trespass on the First Amendment.

It’s a strong educational piece. Even if you’re cheering on Santorum, it’s worth reading and sending around. It is a clear explanation of what is going on. Not for the first time, I am grateful to Mitt Romney.

993 views

Categories:Uncategorized

5 thoughts on “Mitt Romney vs. Obama Administration’s War on Religious Liberty

  1. Lawrence Sanford says:

    And you, Romney, Ryan, Palin, Santorum, Bachmann and the GOP zealot driven have declared war on all religions but your own, war on women’s rights, war on the middle class hard working people, war on medicare, war on social security and war on everything else that is not in accord with the ultra right wing ideology .That is the real war.Romney, you are marching to the drum of haters. Shame on you!

  2. Richard says:

    The last paragraph really gets to bottomline, just put the fracas off till after the election and then the left agenda of this administration can be waged fearlessly. I have been worried about Romney’s stance on moral issues, but this statement helps a lot.

  3. Jeanne says:

    I was glad to see this statement. I had been waiting for him to address the issue and while I like Santorum, I’m glad to know we would have any ally on this issue should Romney be the Republican nominee.

  4. Jason says:

    “I think it’s, in my personal view, it’s the right thing for hospitals to provide information and access to emergency contraception to anyone who is a victim of rape.” Yup, that sounds like conscience protection for hospital workers from Mr. Romney. This guy will say anything to become President. Yay for his most current statement!

    1. Joe M says:

      Jason. Romney vetoed that contraception legislation: http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/index.php?p=26087

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

STAY CONNECTED


DON'T MISS A THING

Receive our updates via email.