Obama administration snubs Vatican with embassy downgrade

We have been quietly following this story for weeks.us-vatican-flags

And now reporter John Allen has broken the news.

The Obama administration has decided that the free-standing American embassy to the Holy See will soon be closed, and the offices for the Ambassador to the Vatican will be moved inside of our Italian Embassy.

As a part of the security reviews that followed the attacks on our embassy in Benghazi last year, State Department officials are now claiming that the current U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is no longer safe.

If their assessment is correct, then why not bolster security or simply move the Embassy to a new location instead of shutting it down? Are all ‘unsafe’ embassies being shut down too?

An unmistakable slap in the face

Moving our Ambassador to the Vatican inside of our Italian Embassy sends a clear message: the diplomatic post doesn’t matter much to the United States.

Yesterday we spoke with former Vatican Ambassador James Nicholson. He wanted us to tell CV readers:

“It’s another manifestation of the antipathy of this administration both to Catholics and to the Vatican – and to Christians in the Middle East. This is a key post for intermediation in so many sovereignties but particularly in the Middle East. This is anything but a good time to diminish the stature of this post. To diminish the stature of this post is to diminish its influence.

“The State Department has for a long time wanted to do this. It came up when I was an ambassador. I explained the folly of this and it went away. But now they seem determined to do this. The perception is [with this action] that the United States is showing a lack of appreciation for the relevance of its diplomatic partner in the Vatican.”

Diplomatic relations between the United States and the Holy See suffered for generations because of rampant anti-Catholicism in our country. It took until 1984, twenty-four years after the election of a Catholic president, for President Ronald Reagan to officially create the first United States Ambassador to the Holy See.

President Reagan would quickly see the importance of the Holy See in international affairs. Reagan and Blessed Pope John Paul II formed a partnership that would lead to the downfall of Communism in Eastern Europe.

And let’s not forget that the Pope regularly communicates with bishops from every country on the planet, and as a result is said to have the greatest foreign intelligence of any world leader. If anything, the United States should be working to grow its relationship with the Vatican — not insult us!

Why the snub?

Simple: anti-family groups hate the Vatican. On the international stage, the Vatican is a fierce proponent of religious freedom, the dignity of all human life, and the traditional family. And the Holy See has vigorously opposed the pro-abortion imperialism pushed by Planned Parenthood and others for decades.

These radical pro-abortion groups have responded by launching a campaign called “See Change” calling for the removal of the Holy See as a member of the United Nations. It’s no secret they want the Vatican’s role in the world diminished, discredited, and ultimately disregarded.

But sadly it seems the Obama administration is now doing their bidding, albeit quietly and carefully under the guise of a ‘security review.’

Our Ambassador to the Vatican will remain in Rome for now. But he will be moved to what amounts to an annex of our Italian embassy.

We’re not stupid.

We get the message.

cheap jordans

cheap air max

Calzoncillos Calvin Klein

Camisetas De Futbol Baratas

michael kors bags outlet

Google Shopping

cheap nike air max

64,927 views

Categories:Church News

78 thoughts on “Obama administration snubs Vatican with embassy downgrade

  1. Diane McD says:

    Moving the US Embassy to the back offices of the Italian Embassy is downgrading the significance of the Office. It’s a way of diminishing it’s importance. Saving one million dollars a year when the Obama Administration just spent the same amount on a big piece of concrete to put on the lawn of the London Embassy, makes this reason seem pretty thin.

  2. GREG SMITH says:

    Let’s look at the facts:

    The Embassy is not being downgraded. It will have the same staff at the same diplomatic ranks as now. Ditto on budget etc.

    It will have its own separate building on the Embassy to Italy grounds with a separate street address and entrance.

    It will save the US Taxpayers about $1,000,000 per year from not paying rent.

    It is closer to the Vatican than the existing facility.

    It will be safer.

  3. D says:

    Really? Really now?! Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill. Now I dislike Obama and what he’s been doing to the Church as much as the next guy, but this really is not a big deal. AT ALL.

    But here’s the truth — facts, not opinions or wild surmisals: the United States is moving the location of the Embassy to a building that is safer, bigger, and architecturally more appealing. It also is slightly closer to Vatican City.

    Let me repeat that point: it’s closer to Vatican City than the current location.

    The new location, which also houses the U.S. Embassy to Italy and U.S. Mission to the United Nations Agencies, is actually closer to Vatican City than the current location. The historic and beautiful building that will house the future Embassy provides ideal and expanded office space for the U.S. diplomats who do the critical work of representing the United States to the Holy See. The future Embassy will be 78 percent larger than the current Embassy. The residence of the U.S. Ambassador to the Holy See will not change.

    No reason to get our pants up in a knot about this situation.

    In fact, go read this and placate yourselves: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/yimcatholic/2013/11/about-moving-the-vatican-city-legation-stuff-i-refuse-to-be-upset-about.html

  4. Jon A says:

    I sure didn’t vote for Obama. I am a practicing Catholic and I have never and will never vote for Obama on ANYTHING!

  5. Gary Lockhart says:

    “Didn’t the majority of Catholics elect and re-elect this president?” Don Carlos

    Only if you think that unscientific exit polls which utilize, at best, highly suspect methodology are accurate. The DLEMM – Dominant Liberal Establishment Mass Media – loves these types of polls due to their very specious nature.

    Exit polls are to the illiterate as smack is to a junkie.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

STAY CONNECTED


DON'T MISS A THING

Receive our updates via email.