<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CatholicVote.org &#187; elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.catholicvote.org/tag/elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.catholicvote.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:46:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>This Tuesday, Support Rick Santorum!</title>
		<link>http://www.catholicvote.org/this-tuesday-support-rick-santorum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.catholicvote.org/this-tuesday-support-rick-santorum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitt romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newt gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ron paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/index.php?p=26245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Tuesday, Missouri holds its Republican primary and Colorado and Minnesota hold their caucuses. If you have reservations about supporting Mitt Romney, and live in one of these three states, this is your last chance to prevent Mitt from winning the GOP nomination. To put it bluntly, I don&#8217;t think Newt Gingrich will be able [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Screen-shot-2012-02-06-at-11.06.30-PM.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-26246" title="Screen shot 2012-02-06 at 11.06.30 PM" src="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Screen-shot-2012-02-06-at-11.06.30-PM-300x173.png" alt="" width="300" height="173" /></a>This Tuesday, <strong>Missouri</strong> holds its Republican primary and <strong>Colorado</strong> and <strong>Minnesota</strong> hold their caucuses.</p>
<p>If you have reservations about supporting Mitt Romney, and live in one of these three states, this is your last chance to prevent Mitt from winning the GOP nomination.</p>
<p>To put it bluntly, I don&#8217;t think Newt Gingrich will be able to challenge Mitt Romney in a 1-on-1 race. Santorum has proven (in Iowa) that we can. Polling shows Santorum is in contention for first place in all three states voting on Tuesday. Katrina Trinko of NRO lays out what she calls &#8220;<a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/290209/santorum-s-last-stand-katrina-trinko">Santorum&#8217;s Last Stand</a>.&#8221; I call it Santorum&#8217;s best chance to win the GOP nomination.</p>
<p>Quin Hillyer of NRO makes perhaps the best political case for Rick Santorum winning the GOP nomination and going on to win the general election. If you&#8217;ve already decided Rick simply can&#8217;t beat Mitt or Obama, I invite you to <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/290132/again-why-not-santorum-quin-hillyer?pg=1">read her piece</a> with an open mind.</p>
<p>(Santorum, I might add, is the only GOP candidate leading Barack Obama in <a href="http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fm.rasmussenreports.com%2Fpublic_content%2Fpolitics%2Fobama_administration%2Fdaily_presidential_tracking_poll&amp;h=DAQEVkv4qAQHA70Y04fbsVvGUCb9e4c96Nzr663UBBiVf0A">Gallup&#8217;s general election match-up</a>.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve made the Catholic case for Rick Santorum before. The simplest way I can pitch Rick is this: he&#8217;s a good man who may disappoint us sometimes (as all politicians do) &#8212; but he will never betray us, and he will never knowingly betray the principles that make this country great. That&#8217;s more than enough for me.</p>
<p>Finally, the thought came to me, if we don&#8217;t nominate Rick, we&#8217;re going to have some moment during the general election or, God forbid, the day after the election, where we look back on this opportunity and realize, &#8220;Hey, we could have nominated Rick back when we had the chance.&#8221;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not guess how that will feel. Let&#8217;s do the right thing today.</p>
<p>So game on, Rick. We&#8217;re behind you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.catholicvote.org/this-tuesday-support-rick-santorum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reader: Election 2011 results, Paterno to resign, Christmas tree tax, Bishop warns of &#8216;Atheocracy&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.catholicvote.org/reader-election-2011-results-paterno-to-resign-christmas-tree-tax-bishop-warns-of-atheocracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.catholicvote.org/reader-election-2011-results-paterno-to-resign-christmas-tree-tax-bishop-warns-of-atheocracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 16:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Mercer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheocracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berlin Wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bishop Conley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic colleges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Paterno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lunchtime Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newt gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/index.php?p=22750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to the Lunchtime Reader, where we assemble important stories to keep your eyes on. Republicans take over Virginia Senate, pending a recount. Bryce Reeves (right) has an 86 vote lead. If that holds, the GOP will control both house of the Legislature and the Governor’s office. http://cvote.to/7w Ohio voters rejected GOP’s public union reform [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Welcome to the Lunchtime Reader, where we assemble important stories to keep your eyes on.</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/bryce-reeves.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-22751" title="bryce-reeves" src="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/bryce-reeves-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>Republicans take over Virginia Senate</strong>, pending a recount. Bryce Reeves (right) has an 86 vote lead. If that holds, the GOP will control both house of the Legislature and the Governor’s office. <a href="http://cvote.to/7w">http://cvote.to/7w</a></p>
<p><strong>Ohio voters rejected</strong> GOP’s public union reform plan but also rejected President Obama’s health care mandate. <a href="http://cvote.to/80">http://cvote.to/80</a></p>
<p>John McCormick in the Weekly Standard: “Why Did Anti-Abortion Mississippi vote down the <strong>Personhood Amendment</strong>”? <a href="http://cvote.to/7x">http://cvote.to/7x</a></p>
<p>Penn  State head coach <strong>Joe Paterno</strong> will resign at the end of the season. Paterno is under criticism for not doing enough to report sex abuse charges against a former assistant coach. <a href="http://cvote.to/7s">http://cvote.to/7s</a></p>
<p>The Obama administration has announced a 15-cent <strong>Christmas tree tax</strong>. <a href="http://cvote.to/7t">http://cvote.to/7t</a></p>
<p>Dorothy Rabinowitz: “Why <strong>Gingrich </strong>Could Win.” <a href="http://cvote.to/7u">http://cvote.to/7u</a></p>
<p><strong>Atheocracy</strong>.  A new word, and a real threat.  Denver’s Bishop James Conley explains. <a href="http://cvote.to/7v">http://cvote.to/7v</a></p>
<p><strong>Siena College</strong>, which is Catholic, invites a speaker to campus who says the Catholic Church has “blood on their hands.” <a href="http://cvote.to/7y">http://cvote.to/7y</a></p>
<p>22 years ago today, the <strong>Berlin Wall</strong> was finally opened and the people of East Germany were no longer imprisoned. Why we must always remember. <a href="http://cvote.to/7r">http://cvote.to/7r</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.catholicvote.org/reader-election-2011-results-paterno-to-resign-christmas-tree-tax-bishop-warns-of-atheocracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reader: Majority of Democrat voters rarely or never go to church, DC Circuit rules for Obamacare, Election Day 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.catholicvote.org/reader-majority-of-democrat-voters-rarely-or-never-go-to-church-dc-circuit-rules-for-obamacare-election-day-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.catholicvote.org/reader-majority-of-democrat-voters-rarely-or-never-go-to-church-dc-circuit-rules-for-obamacare-election-day-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Mercer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lunchtime Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/index.php?p=22690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to the Lunchtime Reader, where we assemble important stories to keep your eyes on. New Gallup poll claims that a majority of Democratic voters (52%) rarely or never attend church. http://cvote.to/7l Election Day today: Personhood Amendment in MS, Public employee reform plan in OH, Guv race in KY, GOP hopes to win State Senate [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Welcome to the Lunchtime Reader, where we assemble important stories to keep your eyes on.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ash-wed.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-22691" title="ash-wed" src="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ash-wed.jpg" alt="" width="377" height="252" /></a>New Gallup poll claims that a majority of Democratic voters (52%) <strong>rarely or never attend church</strong>. <a href="http://cvote.to/7l">http://cvote.to/7l</a></p>
<p>Election Day today: <strong>Personhood Amendment</strong> in MS, Public employee reform plan in OH, Guv race in KY, GOP hopes to win State Senate in VA, Controversial anti-immigration candidate <strong>up for recall</strong> in AZ. <a href="http://cvote.to/7m">http://cvote.to/7m</a></p>
<p>Conservative commentator <strong>Bill Bennett</strong> says the media has been hypocritical but there has been no “lynching” of <strong>Herman Cain</strong>. <a href="http://cvote.to/7j">http://cvote.to/7j</a></p>
<p><strong>Penn  State University officials</strong> are accused of failing to report credible accusations of sexual abuse of minors to the authorities. <a href="http://cvote.to/7n">http://cvote.to/7n</a></p>
<p>Nun excommunicated for Phoenix hospital abortion <strong>given award by Call to Action</strong>. <a href="http://cvote.to/7k">http://cvote.to/7k</a></p>
<p><strong>DC Circuit Court</strong> rules Obamacare to be constitutional. (PDF link). <a href="http://cvote.to/7p">http://cvote.to/7p</a></p>
<p>Senator <strong>Jim DeMint</strong> endorses <strong>Don Stenberg</strong> for the United States Senate seat in Nebraska. <a href="http://cvote.to/7o">http://cvote.to/7o</a> (My interview with Don Stenberg will be published later today.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.catholicvote.org/reader-majority-of-democrat-voters-rarely-or-never-go-to-church-dc-circuit-rules-for-obamacare-election-day-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: Victory for Marriage in New York!</title>
		<link>http://www.catholicvote.org/victory-for-marriage-in-new-york/</link>
		<comments>http://www.catholicvote.org/victory-for-marriage-in-new-york/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/index.php?p=20812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Josh mentioned, the special election that I&#8217;ve been following closely in New York&#8217;s 9th Congressional District (Brooklyn and Queens, NY) to replace disgraced Anthony Wiener took place yesterday and I&#8217;m happy to report that pro-life, pro-marriage Catholic candidate Bob Turner defeated pro-abort, pro-gay-marriage David Weprin by an astonishing 8%! For the first time since [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Screen-shot-2011-09-14-at-2.44.53-PM.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-20813" title="Screen shot 2011-09-14 at 2.44.53 PM" src="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Screen-shot-2011-09-14-at-2.44.53-PM-300x194.png" alt="" width="300" height="194" /></a><a href="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/index.php?p=20803">As Josh mentioned</a>, the special election that I&#8217;ve been <a href="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/index.php?p=20639">following</a> <a href="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/index.php?p=20790">closely</a> in New York&#8217;s 9th Congressional District (Brooklyn and Queens, NY) to replace disgraced Anthony Wiener took place yesterday and I&#8217;m happy to report that pro-life, pro-marriage Catholic candidate <strong>Bob Turner</strong> defeated pro-abort, pro-gay-marriage <strong>David Weprin</strong> by an <strong><a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2011/by_county/NY_US_House_0913.html?SITE=AP&amp;SECTION=POLITICS">astonishing 8%</a></strong>! For the first time since 1923 a Republican won this seat in deeply Democrat territory.</p>
<p>Before I go any farther, <em>special thanks</em> to everyone who heeded my requests to support Bob Turner in what was considered only weeks ago to be race where he only had a long-shot chance at winning.</p>
<p>Bob Turner, I am told, is a daily communicant, a product of Catholic education, and put all of his children through Catholic schools. He is also pro-life and pro-marriage.</p>
<p>The National Organization for Marriage <a href="http://www.nomblog.com/13798/">released a &#8220;flash&#8221; survey this morning</a> revealing that people in the district who believe in marriage voted for Bob Turner 81%-19% (David Weprin had recently voted for same-sex marriage in the NY Assembly). Moreover, Bob Turner, won 72% of the Catholic vote (and 88% of Orthodox Jews, who also strongly believe in marriage) &#8211; more proof that Catholics and other people of faith who prioritize the right to life and the dignity of marriage can swing elections the right way!</p>
<p>This is also a good reminder to us that &#8220;social issues&#8221; &#8212; proLife and proMarriage &#8212; are not &#8220;wedge&#8221; issues that divide Republicans. Instead they are <em>bridge</em> issues that allow socially conservative Democrats to join with Republicans and Independents in electing people who are committed to serving the common good of society (socially conservative Hispanics in the district, for instance, who normally vote Democrat, probably went for Turner as well this go-around).</p>
<p>If you are interested in learning more about this race there is plenty to read on the NOM blog <a href="http://www.nomblog.com/category/states/new-york/">under this tag</a>.</p>
<p>Score one for the good guys in New York this time &#8212; and for the rest of us, may this come as a timely reminder that politics is only as good as the people we elect to be in politics. So let&#8217;s commit ourselves again to electing good men and women who believe in life and marriage if we want to see our representation improve!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.catholicvote.org/victory-for-marriage-in-new-york/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Super Tuesday for Social Issues? [Updated]</title>
		<link>http://www.catholicvote.org/a-super-tuesday-for-social-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.catholicvote.org/a-super-tuesday-for-social-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/index.php?p=20790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, at least a mini Super Tuesday. The North Carolina Senate just voted to allow the people of that state to vote to define marriage as between one man and one woman in May 2012 by a vote of 30-16 (the N.C. House voted to pass the same bill by a margin of 75-42 yesterday). [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/ncmarriage.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-20792" title="ncmarriage" src="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/ncmarriage-300x166.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="166" /></a>Well, at least a <em>mini</em> Super Tuesday. The North Carolina Senate just <a href="http://www.nomblog.com/13664/">voted</a> to allow the people of that state to vote to define marriage as between one man and one woman in May 2012 by a vote of 30-16 (the N.C. House <a href="http://www.nomblog.com/13622/">voted</a> to pass the same bill by a margin of 75-42 yesterday).</p>
<p>&#8230; that sound you <em>aren&#8217;t</em> hearing is the sound of the mainstream media ignoring the news.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/weprinturner.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-20791" title="weprinturner" src="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/weprinturner-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>Meanwhile, the special election in NY-9 (Brooklyn &amp; Queens NY) is shaping up to be very interesting. Pro-life, pro-marriage Catholic Bob Turner is taking on pro-abortion, pro-gay-marriage David Weprin to replace disgraced Anthony Wiener in Congress, in a district that Democrats have a 3-1 voter registration advantage.</p>
<p>Will Bob Turner pull it out? We&#8217;ll certainly see! I&#8217;ll be <a href="http://www.twitter.com/americanpapist">tweeting</a> tonight as the results come in.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, if you live in this district (or have friends or family who do) please go out and <a href="http://www.nomblog.com/13634/">support Bob Turner</a>!</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE: </strong>Bob Turner won tonight&#8217;s special election<strong> <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2011/by_county/NY_US_House_0913.html?SITE=AP&amp;SECTION=POLITICS">54%-46%</a></strong>! A huge upset and awesome news! More from me after I catch a few hours of sleep. In the meantime, see the <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_NY_SPECIAL_ELECTION?SITE=7219&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&amp;CTIME=2011-09-14-00-00-58">AP coverage</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.catholicvote.org/a-super-tuesday-for-social-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Required Reading: Public Discourse’s Symposium on the 2012 Election</title>
		<link>http://www.catholicvote.org/required-reading-public-discourses-symposium-on-the-2102-election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.catholicvote.org/required-reading-public-discourses-symposium-on-the-2102-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catholic social teaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/index.php?p=20088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Public Discourse is a flagship of conservative thought which features some of the top Catholic intellectuals of our day. So I&#8217;m happy to see its editor Ryan Anderson announce their symposium to prepare for the 2012 election &#8212; &#8220;Liberty, Justice, and the Common Good: Political Principles for 2012 and Beyond: Today, Public Discourse launches a ten-day [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/public_discourse-300x84.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-20090" title="public_discourse-300x84" src="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/public_discourse-300x84.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="84" /></a>Public Discourse </em>is a flagship of conservative thought which features some of the top Catholic intellectuals of our day. So I&#8217;m happy to see its editor Ryan Anderson announce their symposium to prepare for the 2012 election &#8212; &#8220;<a href="http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2011/08/3730">Liberty, Justice, and the Common Good: Political Principles for 2012 and Beyond</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-style: normal;">Today, Public Discourse launches a ten-day symposium on “Liberty, Justice, and the Common Good: Political Principles for 2012 and Beyond.” With a view to the next election, we’ve commissioned ten essays, each covering one of the major policy areas that scores of Public Discourse pieces have examined, to give us a survey of the landscape as we scrutinize the candidates who inhabit it. We also hope these articles will prompt the candidates themselves to think through these issues more thoroughly, as they look to enact good policy and not just curry favor with various factions.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-style: normal;">These essays make arguments. They appeal to no authority other than the authority of reason itself to suggest a coherent political philosophy and how it applies to many policy particulars. In a way, these essays will be exemplars ofPublic Discourse’s mission: to put intellectual polish on our political lens, to sharpen our insights into the common good.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-style: normal;">Appropriately, <a href="http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2011/08/3717">the first essay</a> by Carter Snead focused on the primacy of the life issue:</span></p>
<blockquote><p>Today on <em>Public Discourse</em>, Carter Snead launches our 2012 Election Symposium by arguing for the primacy of the life issue. He argues for the importance of the prolife position, explains why the presidency matters so much on this issue, contrasts the actions of our current and former president, and concludes by highlighting what the next president needs to do.</p></blockquote>
<p>Tomorrow&#8217;s essay by National Organization for Marriage chairman Maggie Gallagher focuses on the importance of marriage:</p>
<blockquote><p>If a central task of good government is to recognize the equal dignity of every human life and protect those lives in law, our leaders must also recognize that new life is best nurtured in the context of the marital bond of mother and father as husband and wife. In tomorrow’s essay. Maggie Gallagher argues for the importance of the institution of marriage, both for the health of our society and for principles of limited self-government. The state cannot be allowed to redefine natural, pre-political institutions such as marriage. It must recognize real marriage, and seek to protect and promote it. The breakdown of the family has been one of the chief causes of poverty in our nation, and anyone concerned with the wellbeing of children and the economic health of our nation should see the family as the original—and best—department of health, education, and welfare.</p></blockquote>
<p>I would urge you to check in daily to begin preparing yourself for debates which will continue to occupy our time and attention in 2012 and beyond.</p>
<p>You can also follow the Public Discourse on <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/publicdiscourse">Twitter</a> and <a href="https://www.facebook.com/PublicDiscourse">Facebook</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.catholicvote.org/required-reading-public-discourses-symposium-on-the-2102-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is the Minnesota Catholic Conference opposed to a Voter ID bill?</title>
		<link>http://www.catholicvote.org/why-is-the-minnesota-catholic-conference-opposed-to-a-voter-id-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.catholicvote.org/why-is-the-minnesota-catholic-conference-opposed-to-a-voter-id-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Mercer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catholic conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/index.php?p=13616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems straight forward enough: To cut down on voter fraud, ensure that all persons who vote show their ID. Two state representatives in Minnesota want their state to join eight others in requiring identification to verify that you are who you claim to be. Currently in Minnesota, if you are registered 20 days before the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/voter-id.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-13617" title="voter-id" src="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/voter-id-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>Seems straight forward enough: To cut down on voter fraud, ensure that all persons who vote show their ID. Two state representatives in Minnesota <a href="http://www.tcdailyplanet.net/news/2011/02/03/testimony-taken-voter-id-bills">want their state</a> to join eight others in requiring identification to verify that you are who you claim to be.</p>
<p>Currently in Minnesota, if you are registered 20 days before the election, you can show up at the polls in Minnesota without a state ID and still vote.</p>
<p>But, Minnesota is also one of the few states that allow same-day registration.</p>
<p>So, to register on the same day in Minnesota at least then you <em>have</em> to show a state ID, right? <em>Nope.</em> In fact, Minnesota election laws are so lenient (and open to fraud) that you can show up at the polling place without any ID so long as you have: <a href="http://www.sos.state.mn.us/index.aspx?page=204">&#8220;A voter registered in the same precinct as  you who can confirm your address with a signed oath.&#8221;</a></p>
<p>This might be a good time for me to remind you that Al Franken defeated Norm Coleman by 312 votes in Minnesota&#8217;s 2008 Senate race.</p>
<p>So it would make sense that Rep. Mike Benson and Rep. Mary Kiffmeyer (who once served Minnesota as Secretary of State) would put forth a bill to ensure that there&#8217;s no voter fraud. Their bill would require people to show a ID to vote and would eliminate this provision where someone could &#8220;vouch&#8221; for your residency. Voters who failed to bring ID would be given a provisional ballot.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Letting people vote without a photo ID creates the  ideal conditions  for fraud. It is in fact very easy to  impersonate  someone if you don&#8217;t have to prove who you are,&#8221; said Benson.</p></blockquote>
<p>This sounds like a no-brainer, right? In fact, next door in Wisconsin this headline hit the news <strong>this Monday</strong>: &#8220;<a href="http://www.wfrv.com/news/wisconsin/114931694.html">Wis. task force has charged 20 vote fraud cases</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>What were the charges? Well, six persons have been charged with voter registration misconduct, 11 have been charged with being a felon but still voting, <strong>two have been charged with double voting</strong> and one person obtained an <strong>absentee ballot in his dead wife&#8217;s name</strong> so she could vote for Barack Obama from the grave. (Wow. Gives a whole new meaning to G.K. Chesterton&#8217;s famous line: &#8220;Tradition is the              democracy of the dead. It means giving a vote to the most  obscure              of all classes: our ancestors.&#8221;</p>
<p>So who would oppose this bill? Answer: <a href="http://thecatholicspirit.com/news/local/state-catholic-conference-opposes-voter-id-bills/">The Minnesota Catholic Conference</a>.<span id="more-13616"></span></p>
<p>The staffers at the MCC claim that this bill would disenfranchise college students, minorities and the elderly. “The reality is that a lot of people don’t have photo identification,&#8221; said Katie Conlin, interim social concerns director for MCC.</p>
<p>But the bill includes a provision making state-issued IDs free to those persons who cannot afford them. Not good enough, Conlin says.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;That doesn’t address the difficulty in getting that ID for some  folks. You would still have to have some sort of supporting  documentation in order to get the ID,” Conlin explained. “Let’s say  you’re a woman who got married and had a name change. Then you would  have to have your birth certificate, your marriage license and proof of  your current residence. Then you’d have to get to wherever it is  that the ID is going to be issued. It would affect anyone  with limited access to transportation.”</p></blockquote>
<p>I am trying my best to be charitable, but these excuses just don&#8217;t cut it.</p>
<p>She claims it would disenfranchise minorities presumably because they make up a larger percentage of the poor. (Then why not just say the poor?) But even if the poor cannot afford cars, isn&#8217;t public transportation available that could take them to the DMV or the Secretary of State&#8217;s office? Do the poor have no need for a state ID except to vote? Would they not want an ID <em>if it were free</em>?</p>
<p>Frankly her example of the newly married woman is laughable. Most women get a new driver&#8217;s license when they come home from a honeymoon. It&#8217;s not like they would forget about this until Election Day. &#8220;Oh right, my last name isn&#8217;t Smith anymore! I&#8217;ve been driving around the state with my old name!&#8221;</p>
<p>And how exactly does this disenfranchise college students, the vast majority have state-issued IDs already? They can vote absentee if they want to claim their parent&#8217;s address or they can vote with their campus address. This bill would simply prevent them <em>from casting multiple ballots</em>, like the <a href="http://chippewa.com/article_79dae54c-f978-5b09-bb64-fb0f5a734bbd.html">students at Marquette claimed to have done in 2000</a> (a &#8220;Catholic&#8221; university in Milwaukee, Wis. no less). And since Minnesota&#8217;s election laws are just as lenient as Wisconsin&#8217;s, are you telling me that this kind of voter fraud isn&#8217;t happening at the University of Minnesota?</p>
<p>I live in Michigan and we are required to show our ID in order to vote. This hasn&#8217;t prevented minorities, seniors or college students from voting.</p>
<p>Conlin called the voter ID proposal a waste of money on an unnecessary bill. “All the known prosecutions have been for convicted felons voting, and a  voter ID would not indicate whether a person is a felon,&#8221; said Conlin.</p>
<p>Well, I guess she would wait until what happened in Wisconsin came to Minnesota before she would act. But isn&#8217;t it good to take steps to stop voter fraud before they happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.catholicvote.org/why-is-the-minnesota-catholic-conference-opposed-to-a-voter-id-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EXCITING NEWS: Catholic Families for America joins CatholicVote.org</title>
		<link>http://www.catholicvote.org/exciting-news-catholic-families-for-america-joins-catholicvote-org/</link>
		<comments>http://www.catholicvote.org/exciting-news-catholic-families-for-america-joins-catholicvote-org/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CatholicVote</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catholicvote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/index.php?p=13278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE &#8211; January 24, 2011 CONTACT: Joshua Mercer, mercer@catholicvote.org Catholic Families for America Joins CatholicVote.org Dr. Kevin Roberts to join CatholicVote.org PAC Advisory Board CHICAGO – CatholicVote.org President Brian Burch announced today that Catholic Families for America has joined the CatholicVote.org family of organizations. Based in Texas, Catholic Families for America will be renamed [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE &#8211; January 24, 2011<br />
CONTACT: Joshua Mercer, mercer@catholicvote.org</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Catholic Families for America<br />
Joins CatholicVote.org</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><em>Dr. Kevin Roberts to join CatholicVote.org PAC Advisory Board</em></p>
<p>CHICAGO – CatholicVote.org President Brian Burch announced today that Catholic Families for America has joined the CatholicVote.org family of organizations.</p>
<p>Based in Texas, Catholic Families for America will be renamed CatholicVote.org Southwest and will work to build chapters for CatholicVote.org at the state level.</p>
<p>Dr. Kevin Roberts, Founder of Catholic Families for America, will join CatholicVote.org PAC’s Advisory Board.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/CV-Box-200.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-13279" src="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/CV-Box-200.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>“Catholics must be dedicated advocates for life, marriage, and freedom at the ballot box.   Dr. Kevin Roberts helped build a movement of politically-active Catholic citizens in the southwest that we hope to grow and expand upon.  Dr. Roberts continues to be a strong champion for the Faith and we’re pleased to welcome him and his organization into the CatholicVote.org family,” said Brian Burch, President of CatholicVote.org PAC.</p>
<p>“The opportunity to become part of CatholicVote means that the movement by lay Catholics to reclaim the public square continues to gain momentum.  I look forward to continuing my efforts in cultivating Catholic political activism as part of the CatholicVote team,” said Dr. Roberts.</p>
<p>In addition to serving on the CatholicVote.org PAC Advisory Board, Dr. Roberts will continue to provide his personal daily podcast commentaries at capitolhillcatholic.com.</p>
<p>CatholicVote.org PAC is the political action arm of CatholicVote.org.  The 2010 election cycle marked the inaugural year for the political action committee.  CatholicVote.org PAC endorsed 9 candidates for Congress and 1 Senate candidate.  Seven of the ten endorsees won.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">-30-<strong> </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.catholicvote.org/exciting-news-catholic-families-for-america-joins-catholicvote-org/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Life of the (Tea) Party</title>
		<link>http://www.catholicvote.org/life-of-the-tea-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.catholicvote.org/life-of-the-tea-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 01:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Bowman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pro-Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicvote.org/discuss/?p=12605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first Tea Party Congress is one of the most pro-life Congresses ever.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/imagesCA0FUF17.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-12606" src="http://catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/imagesCA0FUF17.jpg" alt="" width="145" height="192" /></a>There&#8217;s been a lot of talk recently about how the Tea Party movement supposedly isn&#8217;t pro-life, and the new wave of Republicans might ditch social issues.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe it.  The fact is that the new Republicans taking office this Wednesday are just as fervently pro-life as they are pro-economic reform, and are also more pro-life than the corporate Republican party has been.</p>
<p>Of the 87 new Republicans in Congress this week, fully 80 are pro-life.  The Tea Party election yeilded over 50 pro-life improvements, including almost 40 pro-life Members replacing Members who voted consistently pro-abortion, plus 14 or so pro-life Members replacing Members with a mixed pro-life voting record.</p>
<p>The SBA List has an exciting <a href="http://www.sba-list.org/node/2606">profile of the new pro-life members </a>of the U.S. Congress.  <br />
These November winners include many candidates who were <a href="http://catholicvote.org/discuss/?p=11185">endorsed by CatholicVote</a>. </p>
<p>SBAL also hosted a forum today for candidates to chair the RNC: all <a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2011/01/03/gop-chair-candidates-pledge-at-debate-to-work-with-pro-life-groups/">pledged</a> to work with pro-life groups, and added that they support defunding Obama&#8217;s abortion industry partner Planned Parenthood. </p>
<p>So don&#8217;t believe the liberal attempt to pit social conservatives against tea party activists.  The first &#8220;Tea Party Congress&#8221; is one of the most pro-life Congresses ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.catholicvote.org/life-of-the-tea-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No class: Carol Shea-Porter has yet to congratulate Frank Guinta on his win</title>
		<link>http://www.catholicvote.org/no-class-carol-shea-porter-has-yet-to-congratulate-frank-guinta-on-his-win/</link>
		<comments>http://www.catholicvote.org/no-class-carol-shea-porter-has-yet-to-congratulate-frank-guinta-on-his-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 21:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Mercer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carol Shea-Porter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Guinta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicvote.org/discuss/?p=11486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (D-NH) lost re-election to CatholicVote-endorsed Frank Guinta 10 days ago. But she still hasn&#8217;t called Frank Guinta to congratulate him on his victory. We often hear people complain of a lack of civility in politics today. People repeatedly condemn the barrage of attack ads that dominate the television and radio airwaves. But [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/shea-porter.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-11487" title="shea-porter" src="http://catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/shea-porter.jpg" alt="" width="173" height="208" /></a>Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (D-NH) lost re-election to CatholicVote-endorsed Frank Guinta 10 days ago.</p>
<p>But she still <a href="http://unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=John+DiStaso%27s+Granite+Status%3a+If+Sununu+steps+aside%2c+will+Bender+seek+GOP+Chair%3f&amp;articleId=28a8c6ee-acef-4e62-a65c-473835191f91">hasn&#8217;t called</a> Frank Guinta to congratulate him on his victory.</p>
<p>We often hear people complain of a lack of civility in politics today. People repeatedly condemn the barrage of attack ads that dominate the television and radio airwaves.</p>
<p>But after a tough and spirited campaign, we have an important tradition in our country where the defeated candidate calls to congratulate the winner.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s disappointing to see that Carol Shea-Porter refuses this modest gesture toward unity and civility.</p>
<p>(HT: <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/mikememoli/status/3184858780139520">Mike  Memoli</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.catholicvote.org/no-class-carol-shea-porter-has-yet-to-congratulate-frank-guinta-on-his-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
