<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CatholicVote.org &#187; familiy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.catholicvote.org/tag/familiy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.catholicvote.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:32:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>I wonder which Santorum child Senator Brown thinks shouldn’t be with us?</title>
		<link>http://www.catholicvote.org/i-wonder-which-santorum-child-senator-brown-thinks-shouldnt-be-be-with-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.catholicvote.org/i-wonder-which-santorum-child-senator-brown-thinks-shouldnt-be-be-with-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Crowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[familiy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/index.php?p=28271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senator Scott Brown, elected solely because of a national effort to stick a thumb in the eye of the liberal old-guard and not because he is anything resembling conservative, demonstrated a reason why he would not have been elected with so much conservative and Catholic support otherwise. At the South Boston annual St. Patrick&#8217;s Day [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Scott Brown, elected solely because of a national effort to stick a thumb in the eye of the liberal old-guard and not because he is anything resembling conservative, demonstrated a reason why he would not have been elected with so much conservative and Catholic support otherwise.</p>
<p>At the South Boston annual St. Patrick&#8217;s Day breakfast <a href="http://www.hapblog.com/2012/03/scott-brown-secret-service-for-santorum.html?m=1">Brown quipped</a> that Santorum&#8217;s Secret Service detail was &#8220;the first time he&#8217;s actually ever used protection.&#8221;</p>
<p>HA! SO FUNNY! Get it? Because he&#8217;s got lots of kids? They multiply like feral cats, or something, which is REALLY FUNNY!!11!!!1!1!!!!!1</p>
<p>*ahem.*</p>
<div id="attachment_27063" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 360px"><a href="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/ricksfamily.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-27063 " title="The Family Santorum" src="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/ricksfamily.jpg" alt="Apparently &quot;protection&quot; is more important than one or more of these beautiful smiling faces." width="350" height="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Family Santorum</p></div>
<p>Which leads to the question, which of the Santorums&#8217; children does Scott Brown think ought not to be alive? Which should have been denied conception? Because &#8220;protection&#8221; does that: it directly and intentionally denies the possibility that this person-creating act could create a new person. It is utter and complete selfishness in the most sacred action God created man and woman to perform. It is a contra-life action. It is an abuse of the gift of sexuality. It is a denial of the meaning of marriage.</p>
<p>And as such, it is a punch line to those who have bought the lie.</p>
<p>My dad is the third of eleven kids and I am the second of six. I cannot tell you what a blessing a large family has been.</p>
<p>I work at Franciscan University of Steubenville. Four kids is &#8220;a good start&#8221; around here, with a number of families in the double-digits. And the kids of the large families are some of the most well-behaved, capable, happy, and interesting people we&#8217;ve got.</p>
<p>I wonder how many of them (us ?) should not live due to such &#8220;protection.&#8221; Seems all you&#8217;re protecting in so doing is your own cowardice.</p>
<p>Life is a bold endeavor; love includes risk. Don&#8217;t think so? Don&#8217;t think it should? Ask this guy&#8230;</p>
<div id="attachment_16416" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 452px"><a href="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Sacred-Heart-Sic-Deus-Dilexit-Mundum.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-16416" title="Sacred Heart Sic Deus Dilexit Mundum" src="http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Sacred-Heart-Sic-Deus-Dilexit-Mundum.jpg" alt="Sacred Heart Image - Sic Deus Dilexit Mundum" width="442" height="574" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">&quot;For God So Loved the World.&quot;</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.catholicvote.org/i-wonder-which-santorum-child-senator-brown-thinks-shouldnt-be-be-with-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
