Obama administration snubs Vatican with embassy downgrade

We have been quietly following this story for weeks.us-vatican-flags

And now reporter John Allen has broken the news.

The Obama administration has decided that the free-standing American embassy to the Holy See will soon be closed, and the offices for the Ambassador to the Vatican will be moved inside of our Italian Embassy.

As a part of the security reviews that followed the attacks on our embassy in Benghazi last year, State Department officials are now claiming that the current U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is no longer safe.

If their assessment is correct, then why not bolster security or simply move the Embassy to a new location instead of shutting it down? Are all ‘unsafe’ embassies being shut down too?

An unmistakable slap in the face

Moving our Ambassador to the Vatican inside of our Italian Embassy sends a clear message: the diplomatic post doesn’t matter much to the United States.

Yesterday we spoke with former Vatican Ambassador James Nicholson. He wanted us to tell CV readers:

“It’s another manifestation of the antipathy of this administration both to Catholics and to the Vatican – and to Christians in the Middle East. This is a key post for intermediation in so many sovereignties but particularly in the Middle East. This is anything but a good time to diminish the stature of this post. To diminish the stature of this post is to diminish its influence.

“The State Department has for a long time wanted to do this. It came up when I was an ambassador. I explained the folly of this and it went away. But now they seem determined to do this. The perception is [with this action] that the United States is showing a lack of appreciation for the relevance of its diplomatic partner in the Vatican.”

Diplomatic relations between the United States and the Holy See suffered for generations because of rampant anti-Catholicism in our country. It took until 1984, twenty-four years after the election of a Catholic president, for President Ronald Reagan to officially create the first United States Ambassador to the Holy See.

President Reagan would quickly see the importance of the Holy See in international affairs. Reagan and Blessed Pope John Paul II formed a partnership that would lead to the downfall of Communism in Eastern Europe.

And let’s not forget that the Pope regularly communicates with bishops from every country on the planet, and as a result is said to have the greatest foreign intelligence of any world leader. If anything, the United States should be working to grow its relationship with the Vatican — not insult us!

Why the snub?

Simple: anti-family groups hate the Vatican. On the international stage, the Vatican is a fierce proponent of religious freedom, the dignity of all human life, and the traditional family. And the Holy See has vigorously opposed the pro-abortion imperialism pushed by Planned Parenthood and others for decades.

These radical pro-abortion groups have responded by launching a campaign called “See Change” calling for the removal of the Holy See as a member of the United Nations. It’s no secret they want the Vatican’s role in the world diminished, discredited, and ultimately disregarded.

But sadly it seems the Obama administration is now doing their bidding, albeit quietly and carefully under the guise of a ‘security review.’

Our Ambassador to the Vatican will remain in Rome for now. But he will be moved to what amounts to an annex of our Italian embassy.

We’re not stupid.

We get the message.

cheap jordans

cheap air max

Calzoncillos Calvin Klein

Camisetas De Futbol Baratas

michael kors bags outlet

Google Shopping

cheap nike air max


Categories:Church News

78 thoughts on “Obama administration snubs Vatican with embassy downgrade

  1. Cypess says:

    James Nicholson? Isn’t he the former Chairman of the RNC?

  2. Dr. S says:

    I find it fascinating that most folks are for cutting the Federal budget until someone cuts the budget. Clearly, this is an efficiency move brought on by budget cuts. With the Italian embassy minutes away, it makes no economic sense to maintain a full-fledged embassy at the Vatican. Until we are responsible enough to raise our taxes sufficiently to cover our bills, we had better get used to having less service.

  3. Mr. D. Ragsdale says:

    As a faithful Catholic, I did not vote for this President. He is the most anti-life President of record. He is also anti-conscience and anti-liberty of Healthcare professionals and others who oppose his anti-life edicts. There are scores of lawsuits against his policies. It is no surprise that this President has snubbed the Vatican. My fellow Americans elected this man as our President. I love my Country and I respect the office of the Presidency, but God first.

  4. Mister Z says:

    If you have actually been following this story at all, you know that the plans for this move were begun during the Bush Administration. It is nothing new. Another phony attack on Obama.

  5. Ron McGinnis says:

    Latest information is that that the move is to a better place
    closer to the Vatican and was planned in the Bush
    Administration. News was just
    released today.

  6. Jesús says:

    Do not say the traditional family but the NATURAL family. It is not by tradition that the natural family is the authentic family.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



Receive our updates via email.