Planned Parenthood Releases Poll on 20 Week- Abortion Ban


However, last month Planned Parenthood published the results of its own survey on 20-week abortion bans. Many media outlets have been quick to use the results to raise questions about the popularity of such legislation. The results indicate that over 60 percent of respondents feel that abortion should be legal after 20 weeks if the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest. Additionally, more than 60 percent felt that such abortions should be legal if carrying the pregnancy to term would cause long-term health problems for the woman. A majority felt abortion should be legal after 20 weeks in the case of several fetal abnormalities.

In actuality, the results of this survey fail to raise serious questions about the polls that came out this summer showing support for a 20-week ban. Survey research shows that many people are conflicted about abortion. Most Americans dislike abortion, would like to see fewer abortions, and feel comfortable with late-term abortion bans and other incremental pro-life laws.  That having been said, a substantial body of polling data shows that Americans think abortion should be a legal option when a pregnant women is facing difficult circumstances. The recent Planned Parenthood poll simply shows that is the case even with later-term abortions.

For a variety of reasons, pursuing a 20-week abortion ban is good strategy for pro-lifers.  The fact that there exists medical evidence that the unborn can feel pain at 20 weeks persuades many people to support such legislation.  Furthermore, the fact that the unborn can feel pain could create an additional legal rationale – in addition to viability — that would allow states to provide protection to the unborn. That having been said, pro-lifers should not simply dismiss the results of this Planned Parenthood survey.  It  shows once more that in the abortion debate framing and messaging are always important. Pro-lifers would, as always, do well to be vigilant.

The views expressed here are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of


About Author

MICHAEL J. NEW, Ph.D., is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Michigan – Dearborn. He is also an Adjunct Scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute, the Research and Education Arm of the Susan B. Anthony List. A Phi Beta Kappa graduate from Dartmouth College, Dr. New received a master’s degree in statistics and a doctorate in political science from Stanford University in 2002. Before coming to Michigan, Dr. New worked as a postdoctoral researcher at the Harvard-MIT Data Center and later taught at The University of Alabama. Dr. New researches and writes about the social science of pro-life issues. He gives presentations on both the positive impact of pro-laws and the gains in public support for the pro-life position. He is a frequent blogger on National Review Online's "The Corner." Dr. New's study pro-life legislation was recently published by State Politics and Policy Quarterly. Four of his other studies on the effects of pro-life legislation have been published by the Heritage Foundation and another study was published by Family Research Council in 2008.

Leave A Reply